MadSci Network: Chemistry
Query:

Re: Which releases worse toxic materials when burned, Styrofoam or Fiberglass?

Date: Fri Oct 30 09:46:50 2009
Posted By: Harry Adam, Retired/self-employed
Area of science: Chemistry
ID: 1256505471.Ch
Message:

Styrofoam is the brand name Dow Chemicals use for extruded polystyrene 
foam, which is made in different densities for different applications. 
Your question relates to the type used in home insulation (as opposed to 
the type used for example, to make disposable drinking cups). Nowadays 
the gas used to foam the polymerising styrene is usually nitrogen whereas 
it used to often be CFC’s (chlorofluorocarbons), but these damage the 
ozone layer and are no longer used. This is good, as this in turn will 
yield fewer toxins when the polystyrene burns. In a typical house fire, 
there will be a range of combustion temperatures – this being key to the 
combustion products generated – and there may be particulates, styrene 
monomer (toxic) as well as the expected carbon monoxide (toxic) and 
carbon dioxide (not so toxic, but which if excluding oxygen, will kill). 
All of this sounds bad, but compared to what? Burning wood produces toxic 
fumes, smoke and a variety of toxic and non-toxic gases and from the MSDS 
(Materials Safety Data Sheet) I found below, it is suggested that 
polystyrene foam combustion would be no worse in toxic products produced 
than wood.  Cyanide (in the form of hydrogen cyanide or  HCN) – is not a 
likely combustion product of any significance.

See the MSDS I found at:
 http://www.glasscellisofab.com/sheets/polystyrene/msds/styrofoam_ms
ds.pdf

-	where you will find the following statement:
-	
“Upon burning the product generates dense black smoke with small
amounts of hydrogen bromide, -chloride, and -fluoride. Studies have
shown that the products of combustion of this foam are not more acutely
toxic than the products of combustion of common building materials
such as wood.”

This particular statement implies that in this example, halogenated gases 
are used in expanding the polystyrene – and yet the consequences of 
combustion are claimed to be no worse than burning wood.

Fiberglass is a less well defined material as the glass is reinforcement 
to a polymer based resin material, and it is the combustion of the resin 
that will be the issue in making a comparison. Here is one MSDS regarding 
a fibreglass product;  http://www.unisub.com/worldof/Tips/pdf-word/MSDS-FR%
20Plastic%20Unisub.doc

However, different manufacturers will have different resins with somewhat 
differing combustion products. This one suggests the combustion 
products “are expected to be primarily aldehydes, carbon monoxide, and 
smoke.” 

So, it is not possible to give a definitive answer to your question – 
because it does depend on the constituents of the fibreglass resin, but 
you are almost certainly no worse off by the switch from fibreglass to 
polystyrene, and possibly better off. This is certainly not an issue you 
should lose any sleep over; there is no chance you will be poisoned by 
cyanide gas as a result of a neighbour’s house going up (at least as a 
consequence of his insulation), and if I were to hazard a guess, (pun 
intended) you are much more likely to suffer an early demise in that 
event by your own house going up in sympathy, while you sleep. Talking of 
which - flammability comparisons between the two insulating materials is 
another issue...

Thanks for the question, and I hope you sleep easier as a result of my 
answer!



Current Queue | Current Queue for Chemistry | Chemistry archives

Try the links in the MadSci Library for more information on Chemistry.



MadSci Home | Information | Search | Random Knowledge Generator | MadSci Archives | Mad Library | MAD Labs | MAD FAQs | Ask a ? | Join Us! | Help Support MadSci


MadSci Network, webadmin@madsci.org
© 1995-2006. All rights reserved.